Monday, January 08, 2007

Brain-Based or Brain-Compatible Learning

When educators manufacture lessons, there is certainly a need to have a knowledge-base to begin the process. However, too many times this knowledge-base rests solely in the fields to that which apply to the subject and not enough of the knowledge-base reflects science and research.

Since I taught math for numerous years, I can say I did a great job of explaining how to factor polynomial expressions, solve trigonometric equations, and calculate volumes of solids, such as cones and pyramids. But, did I teach students how to do these things? Reflecting on my early practices, I would have to say I did a mediocre job at best.

My inability to teach these things at an optimum level was due to my ignorance of brain-based or brain-compatible research. According to Patricia Wolfe (AASA, 2006), brain-compatible learning reflects the following five characteristics:

  1. How we use our brains shapes the brains we have. This means that our brains change to respond to need. Certain abilities are enhanced the more they are used because the brain actually changes to respond to the heightened demands placed on those areas. Like a weight-lifter who works on biceps to make them grow, our brains will undergo specific physiological changes and be enhanced as a result of frequent activities that target a particular set of tasks. Wolfe says that concrete experience best shapes our brains.


  2. Memory is stored in numerous places within our brains. When an event is experienced, it is decomposed into various categories, like sounds, visuals, and emotions. These traits are stored in specific areas in our brains. When we reflect on these experiences, our brains reassemble the pieces and place them together to recreate the experience. The more places the information is stored, the more connections are formed and the greater the memory becomes. This invites educators to use multimodal instruction.


  3. Memory fades over time. As experiences flood our brains, old experiences become less pronounced. However, Wolfe invites educators to utilize what she calls 'rehearsal strategies' to enable memory recall. These strategies include "visualizing, writing, symbolizing, singing, semantic mapping, simulating and devising mnemonics."


  4. There are different types of memories. There are declarative (what our favorite color is and the names of the planets) and procedural (how to operate a computer and play a musical instrument) memories. Repetition is useful for handling procedural information but elaborative rehearsal strategies are essential for handling declarative information.


  5. Emotion is an essential tool for learning. Emotions help make events memorable. Some emotions are shocking, like the destruction of New York's towers and others are comfortably sublime, like eating our favorite ice cream. When considering emotion within an educational setting, learning best occurs when students perceive the environment to be non-threatening.

Wolfe also points out that there is a considerable amount of beliefs that are shared among educators that are not necessarily accurate. For instance, she sites old studies that point to left-brain and right-brain characteristics that have long been overshadowed by more recent research. We educators have to be careful what we disseminate as truth as it definitely impacts how we manufacture lessons and educate our populace.

Knowledge of current brain research makes it easier to create lessons that are brain-based and brain-compatible, in effect making it easier for kids to learn and easier for us to teach. As a result of following brain-compatible research, it can make the process of educating students more successful and more enjoyable for everyone.

Resource
Wolfe, P. (2006) Brain-Compatible Learning: Fad or Foundation? Accessed on January 8th, 2007 from The Administrator Magazine, which can be viewed online at: http://www.aasa.org/publications/saarticledetail.cfm?ItemNumber=7810.

4 comments:

Lauren526 said...

I too am an advocate for brain-compatible learning. I am a Kindergarten teacher who employs brain-friendly strategies in the classroom. Some brain-friendly strategies I use in my classroom, that may work at any level, include:
-providing children with concise, exact directions
-setting realistic expectations
-offering frequent, specific feedback
-challenging with low risk
-review
-focusing on the process
-allowing for multiple modalities of learning
If you try any of these techniques and they work (or not) in your classroom, I would love to hear back.

karadimos said...

Lauren:

Can you be more specific about multiple modalities and how you reach to them?

Thanks in advance.

Lauren526 said...

Allowing for multiple modalities of learning is an important part of differentiating instruction. I am able to teach to the varying modalities by preparing centers. For example:
Visual learners do well with, but all learners get value from:
puzzles, writing, drawing, reading, memory games
Kinesthetic learners do well with, but all learners get value from:
clay, floor puzzles, acting out a play, experiments
Auditory learners do well with, but all learners get value from:
books on tape, small group instruction, retellings
Whenever you teach a concept in a variety of ways, you greatly increase the chances of reaching each student, since you have created many neurological pathways in the brain!

karadimos said...

Thanks for the comment. It's nice to hear these strategies from other people. Not only does it reaffirm my beliefs, but it also allows me to get good ideas from others. May other educators steal these ideas like rampant thieves.